Responsibility and the Normative Order Assumption
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
The Total Order Assumption
The total order assumption (TOA) is the assumption that all execution sequences of observable actions or events are totally ordered by precedence. As long as in some cases TOA is to the point, total order and partial order semantics are both legitimate but lead to different theories. I argue that TOA is a simplifying assumption, and present an example of a total order theory without interleavin...
متن کاملDenial of Responsibility and Normative Negation
In this paper I provide some linguistic evidence to the thesis that responsibility judgments are normative. I present an argument from negation, since the negation of descriptive judgments is structurally different from the negation of normative judgments. In particular, the negation of responsibility judgments seem to conform to the pattern of the negation of normative judgments, thus being a ...
متن کاملPreferences and Assumption-Based Argumentation for Conflict-Free Normative Agents
Argumentation can serve as an effective computational tool and as a useful abstraction for various agent activities and in particular for agent reasoning. In this paper we further support this claim by mapping a form of normative BDI agents onto assumption-based argumentation. By way of this mapping we equip our agents with the capability of resolving conflicts amongst norms, beliefs, desires a...
متن کاملCon ict-free normative agents using assumption-based argumentation
Argumentation can serve as a useful abstraction for various agent activities and in particular for agent reasoning. In this paper we further support this claim by mapping a form of normative BDI agents onto assumption-based argumentation. By way of this mapping we equip our agents with the capability of resolving con icts amongst norms, beliefs, desires and intentions. This con ict resolution i...
متن کاملEthical copula, negation, and responsibility judgments - Prior's contribution to the philosophy of normative language
Prior’s arguments for and against seeing ‘ought’ as a copula and his considerations about normative negation are applied to the case of responsibility judgments. My thesis will be that responsibility judgments, even though often expressed by using the verb ‘to be’, are in fact normative judgments. This is shown by analyzing their negation, which parallels the behavior of ought negation.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Law and Contemporary Problems
سال: 1986
ISSN: 0023-9186
DOI: 10.2307/1191626